Home > General Health > Slim fast recall triggers thoughts on the reasoning behind supplimentation.

Slim fast recall triggers thoughts on the reasoning behind supplimentation.

So today Slim Fast has recalled all of their canned products because of a possible bacterial contamination. This the latest in the ongoing saga of recalls featuring all things canned and otherwise. No special date specifications or UPC codes to match. There’s a remote chance you could end up ingesting some of these bacteria and get really sick. This isn’t the sort of weight loss they had in mind, so they’re recalling the entire line.

It is this kind of news that feeds the ongoing debate about the industrialization of the western diet, and the evils therein. With help from the likes of Michael Pollan (author of “The Omnivour’s Dillema” and “In Defense of Food”) and recent documentaries like “Food, Inc”, this ongoing debate between foodie fist shakers and the multi billion dollar industry has become increasingly lively over the last few years.

So here we have an excellent example of a bunch of tennants on both sides going terribly wrong:  many people , foodies and non-foodies alike, feel compelled to lose weight as a part of their quest to be healthy. In doing so many find themselves reaching for the supplimentary approach, it being presumably a more healthy approach than regular old dieting. Put another way, instead of eating a normal meal, they are looking for promising and nutritious alternatives in an effort to ensure that they meet their nutritional and bodily ideals as perscribed  by the latest in health science.

I recall when I was younger my Grandfather had to replace his regular diet for a time with canned meal replacements as a result of a stroke. He couldn’t actually swallow, so he had to ‘drink’ his meals via a stomach tube. Thankfully this didn’t last terribly long, but I have often pondered how they managed to get a hole dinner into one or two of these little cans vanilla/chocolate/strawberry flavoured cans. And is that what neopolatain ice cream was made of?

Today I see similar products all over the place. At the grocery store and pharmacy to be sure, but also in the hands of coworkers in the office; people who are assumably completely healthy and claim to be simply too busy to take the elevator downstairs to pick up a deli sandwich. I can’t help but wonder still: how is it possible to replace the enjoyment and value of a reasonable meal-like-object into a processed and pasteurized canned liquid?

And it occurred to me yesterday at the local health-stuff store: it’s not just cans. It’s powders, pills and promises in jars and tubes. It’s the promise of health in a form that is both fast and convenient. You can tailor your supplimentation to suit your desire. With slim fast we hope to shed some pounds, but that brand is but 4 steps down the aisle from protien powders that will help you ‘bulk up’, should that be your desire. It’s like those chemistry sets I lusted after as a child but never received, with all the ingredients necessary to create the ideal and optimally healthy human being we crave to be. No sandwiches or salads required.

But at what cost? Sure, there’s the lost joys granted by the simple act of eating. What is there to say about entrusting our nutrition to a company, where the central aim is probably more along the line of garnering profit than it is focused on helping me find my ideal and healthiest form? More importantly: are we right in assuming that these products will do what they promise if we follow the instructions on the label? What if something goes wrong (as it clearly has with these products from Slim Fast)? Sure we get our money back, but where do we go to fill the void when we’ve already taken the idea having a sandwich for lunch out of our routines? Do we consider getting back on the sandwich, or do we suppliment in lieu of the lost suppliment?

If the questions are enough to drive you to eat candy, the answers are no better. There simply aren’t any straight ones. Sure we can demonize industrialization and the loss of the good old days all we like, but that’s not going to help us get our lunch back. What it may do is give us something to vent our frustrations on one rant at a time. Once we’re done shaking our fists, though, we still won’t really know how to make sure we are healthy.

So maybe the answer is in not thinking so hard. Maybe we should just dumb the whole thing down and retake our calm in the form of a simple sandwich. Maybe Pollan is right, and we should just “Eat food.” We can even skip the however-many pages in his latest book and just go with what is simple and logical.

We can learn to cook yummy things that don’t come in jars with labels and indications of how much of our daily recommended sodium intake are involved. Maybe they aren’t 100% balanced and would cause that enigmatic food piramid to blush they’re so nutritionally lopsided. Find the ugliest veg in the product aisle and see what you can learn about it (my money’s on celeriac: ugly as sin, but you just treat it like potatoes and you’re good to go).

Just take a deep breath, let go of the metal tab under your finger, and stop thinking so hard. You might be healthier for it. You might not. Either way you’ll definately find more enjoyment in it.

http://www.cbc.ca/consumer/story/2009/12/04/consumer-slim-fast-recall.html.

Advertisements
Categories: General Health

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: